Auto QA

Every call scored. Every score you can defend.

Manual QA reviews a few calls per agent per month and hopes they are representative. Auto QA applies your scorecard to every conversation, AI and human, the day it happens. Your QA leads spend their time on disputes, calibration and coaching instead of listening to recordings.

spine·voice · auto qa
scorecard v11 · 100% of calls
Auto QA · Personal loan servicingcall #81503
71score
1auto-fail
5:38handle
−0.3sentiment
CriterionResultWeight
Recording disclosed at open✓ pass
Identity verified before balance sharedauto-fail
Payoff amount stated correctly✓ pass
Offered autopay enrollment✓ pass
call #81503 · scored · auto-fail: identity · sent to QA lead · coaching queued · audit:chained ✓ ·
Loan servicing scorecard, sample data · rendered by spine·voice
then a QA lead reviews the fail →
SPINE · QA REVIEW · call #81503live
step 01Score against scorecard v11every call, same dayAuto · score
step 02Confirm auto-fail on agent recordrouted to a named QA leadHeld · human
✓ confirmed · named QA lead · audit entry signed
How it scores

Your standards, applied the same way every time.

Two human reviewers rarely score the same call the same way. Auto QA does, and every result links back to the moment in the call that earned it.

01

Your scorecard

Criteria, weights and auto-fail rules come from your QA team and are versioned. Why it matters: you measure what your business and your regulator care about.

02

Every conversation

100% of calls scored, not a sample. Why it matters: one bad call in a thousand is found, not missed.

03

AI and human alike

VoiceAI and your people are scored on the same criteria. Why it matters: automation earns trust with evidence, not promises.

04

Evidence per criterion

Each pass or fail points to the transcript line behind it. Why it matters: agents accept feedback they can hear for themselves.

05

Compliance checks

Required disclosures, identity checks and debt collection rules such as Regulation F. Why it matters: misses are caught the same day, while they can still be put right.

06

Straight into coaching

Low scores open a coaching item with the call attached. Why it matters: feedback reaches the agent this week, not next quarter.

Disputes and calibration

The machine scores. People keep it honest.

An automated score that nobody can challenge will not survive a floor meeting. Agents can dispute any result, a named QA lead decides it and calibration sessions compare machine and human scores so the scorecard keeps improving.

  • Disputes go to a humanAny agent can challenge a score. A QA lead reviews it with the transcript and the result is recorded.
  • Calibration on a scheduleQA leads score a set of calls and compare with Auto QA, so drift is spotted early.
  • Scorecards are versionedEvery change to a criterion or weight is recorded, so any score can be traced to the rules in force that day.
spine·voice // calibration · batch 145 calls_
Auto QA · Calibration sessionsample
CallAuto QA vs leadAgreement
#81503 · loan servicing71 vs 70
#81517 · payoff request88 vs 90
#81522 · hardship enquiry62 vs 78
#81540 · autopay setup95 vs 95
1 criterion flagged for rewordingOpen dispute
Calibration between Auto QA and a QA lead, sample data · rendered by spine·voice
Why it matters

Quality you can show to an auditor.

Scores sit on the same tamper-evident audit chain as every other action on Spine, next to the Compliance Center that maps controls across 15 frameworks.

✓Lower compliance risk

Every call is checked for the statements your rules require, so exposure is known rather than estimated.

✓Fairer reviews

Agents are judged on all of their calls, not the three that happened to be picked.

✓QA time spent well

Your QA team moves from listening to deciding: disputes, calibration and coaching.

Book a demo

Send us your scorecard. See it applied to a call.

We will set up your criteria, score a simulated call from your queue and walk through a dispute from start to finish.

100% of calls scored Disputes to a person Calibration built in